🚗 #GateSquareCommunityChallenge# Round 1 — Who Will Be The First To The Moon?
Brain challenge, guess and win rewards!
5 lucky users with the correct answers will share $50 GT! 💰
Join:
1️⃣ Follow Gate_Square
2️⃣ Like this post
3️⃣ Drop your answer in the comments
📅 Ends at 16:00, Sep 17 (UTC)
Google Keeps Chrome as Judge Rejects Breakup, Orders Alternative Remedies
A U.S. federal judge delivered a landmark ruling on Tuesday in one of the biggest antitrust battles of the decade. Google will be allowed to keep its Chrome browser, but the company now faces strict remedies designed to curb its dominance in online search and advertising.
A ruling that changes the rules of the game Judge Amit Mehta rejected demands to break up the company and instead focused on limiting exclusive agreements and requiring data-sharing obligations with rivals. Google must open parts of its search index and advertising tools to competing platforms. The Department of Justice argued that Google has abused its market power for years: Controlled Up To 90% Of Search Queries In The U.S.Bought Preferential Treatment As The Default Search Engine On Billions Of DevicesCreated A “Self-Reinforcing Cycle Of Monopolization”
AI and blockchain as the new frontier The decision comes at a time when Google is expanding beyond traditional search. The company is building its own Layer-1 blockchain and doubling down on artificial intelligence integration across its ecosystem. Meanwhile, competition is heating up as new AI-powered browsers from firms like OpenAI or Perplexity challenge Google’s dominance.
Analysts: Google’s edge remains Experts note that while mandatory data-sharing could help rivals improve targeting and services, Google will still retain its ecosystem advantage and vertical integration. Major shifts in market share therefore appear unlikely. “Chrome maintains its distribution edge. Google continues to benefit from the synergy of search, advertising, and AI,” analysts observed.
“Less drastic solutions” over breakups The ruling sets a precedent — instead of breaking up a tech giant, regulators may opt for contractual regulation and open-access requirements. Legal experts suggest this approach could be applied in future cases against other giants like Meta or Amazon. “The judiciary must adapt to the pace of technology,” experts say. “It’s not about dictating market winners, but about setting fairer rules of the game.”
#Chrome , #Google , #technews , #AI , #Regulation
Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies! Notice: ,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“