🎉 Gate Square’s "Spark Program" Surpasses 1,000 KOLs!
💥 The creator ecosystem is in full bloom!
📈 Get featured, earn rewards, and grow your influence—what are you waiting for?
💰 Cash incentives ✔️
🚀 Traffic support ✔️
👑 Exclusive verification ✔️
From 0 to 1,000 in just weeks—Gate Square is becoming the epicenter of Web3 content! ⚡
You’re not just posting content, but the next "viral opportunity"!
🌟 Join the Spark Program and kickstart your breakthrough!
👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/45695
With the $btc ATH, more friends from outside the circle are asking me what to buy? What projects can we do to serve the community? Do we have any resources? 🤣😂
I still remember several years ago, when I wasn't so greasy, my coach said to me:
The relative velocity of air determines lift.
An airplane needs lift to take off, and lift is generated by the wings as they move through the air (this has nothing to do with ground wind; the key is the speed "relative to the air").
If the wind is a headwind, then the aircraft only needs to achieve a lower ground speed to reach the same lift threshold. Just imagine, if it never reaches this speed, the aircraft won't have enough lift to take off and will be close to the end of the runway.....
p/s: Therefore, the vast majority of airport runways are usually designed to align with the prevailing wind direction throughout the year, so don't be afraid.
So: taking off and landing against the wind is suitable, while taking off and landing with the wind increases the danger level.
What about the tailwind?
With a tailwind, cruising is more efficient; assuming a tailwind, the aircraft will fly faster and consume less fuel. Conversely, if cruising into a headwind, the aircraft requires more thrust to "cut through the wind."
Overall:
Taking off/landing against the wind requires a shorter distance, achieves "lift" faster, and is safer.
Smooth sailing, faster, more fuel-efficient, more effective
So much has been said, did you, being smart, get it?
Ride the wind and be like a Chaozhou person