#Gate 2025 Semi-Year Community Gala# voting is in progress! 🔥
Gate Square TOP 40 Creator Leaderboard is out
🙌 Vote to support your favorite creators: www.gate.com/activities/community-vote
Earn Votes by completing daily [Square] tasks. 30 delivered Votes = 1 lucky draw chance!
🎁 Win prizes like iPhone 16 Pro Max, Golden Bull Sculpture, Futures Voucher, and hot tokens.
The more you support, the higher your chances!
Vote to support creators now and win big!
https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/45974
AI Layer1 Rising Star Emerges: Sentient Builds On-Chain DeAI Infrastructure
AI Layer1 Research Report: Finding the On-Chain DeAI Fertile Ground
Overview
Background
In recent years, leading tech companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta have been continuously driving the rapid development of large language models (LLMs). LLMs have demonstrated unprecedented capabilities across various industries, significantly expanding the realm of human imagination, and even showing the potential to replace human labor in certain scenarios. However, the core of these technologies is firmly held by a few centralized tech giants. With substantial capital and control over expensive computational resources, these companies have established insurmountable barriers, making it difficult for the vast majority of developers and innovation teams to compete.
At the same time, in the early stage of the rapid evolution of AI, public opinion often focuses on the breakthroughs and conveniences brought by technology, while attention to core issues such as privacy protection, transparency, and security is relatively insufficient. In the long run, these issues will profoundly affect the healthy development of the AI industry and its acceptance by society. If not properly addressed, the debate over whether AI will be used "for good" or "for evil" will become increasingly prominent, and centralized giants, driven by profit motives, often lack sufficient incentive to proactively address these challenges.
Blockchain technology, with its decentralized, transparent, and censorship-resistant characteristics, offers new possibilities for the sustainable development of the AI industry. Currently, numerous "Web3 AI" applications have emerged on mainstream blockchains such as Solana and Base. However, a deeper analysis reveals that these projects still face many issues: on one hand, the degree of decentralization is limited, as key processes and infrastructure still rely on centralized cloud services, and the meme attributes are overly heavy, making it difficult to support a truly open ecosystem; on the other hand, compared to AI products in the Web2 world, on-chain AI still has limitations in terms of model capabilities, data utilization, and application scenarios, and the depth and breadth of innovation need to be improved.
To truly realize the vision of decentralized AI, enabling the blockchain to securely, efficiently, and democratically support large-scale AI applications, and to compete with centralized solutions in terms of performance, we need to design a Layer 1 blockchain tailored specifically for AI. This will provide a solid foundation for open innovation in AI, democratic governance, and data security, promoting the prosperous development of a decentralized AI ecosystem.
Core Features of AI Layer 1
AI Layer 1, as a blockchain tailored specifically for AI applications, has its underlying architecture and performance design closely aligned with the needs of AI tasks, aiming to efficiently support the sustainable development and prosperity of the on-chain AI ecosystem. Specifically, AI Layer 1 should possess the following core capabilities:
Efficient Incentives and Decentralized Consensus Mechanism The core of AI Layer 1 lies in building an open network for sharing resources such as computing power and storage. Unlike traditional blockchain nodes that mainly focus on ledger bookkeeping, the nodes of AI Layer 1 need to undertake more complex tasks, not only providing computing power and completing AI model training and inference but also contributing diverse resources such as storage, data, and bandwidth, thereby breaking the monopoly of centralized giants in AI infrastructure. This places higher demands on the underlying consensus and incentive mechanisms: AI Layer 1 must be able to accurately assess, incentivize, and validate the actual contributions of nodes in tasks such as AI inference and training, achieving network security and efficient resource allocation. Only in this way can the stability and prosperity of the network be guaranteed and the overall computing power costs effectively reduced.
Excellent high performance and heterogeneous task support capability. AI tasks, especially the training and inference of LLMs, place extremely high demands on computing performance and parallel processing capabilities. Furthermore, the on-chain AI ecosystem often needs to support diverse and heterogeneous task types, including different model architectures, data processing, inference, storage, and other diverse scenarios. AI Layer 1 must deeply optimize the underlying architecture for high throughput, low latency, and elastic parallelism, while also providing native support for heterogeneous computing resources, ensuring that various AI tasks can run efficiently and achieve smooth scaling from "single-task" to "complex and diverse ecosystem."
Verifiability and Assurance of Trustworthy Outputs AI Layer 1 not only needs to prevent security risks such as model malfeasance and data tampering but also must ensure the verifiability and alignment of AI output results from the underlying mechanisms. By integrating cutting-edge technologies such as Trusted Execution Environments (TEE), Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZK), and Secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC), the platform allows each instance of model inference, training, and data processing to be independently verified, ensuring the fairness and transparency of the AI system. At the same time, this verifiability helps users clarify the logic and basis of AI outputs, achieving "what is obtained is what is desired," thereby enhancing user trust and satisfaction with AI products.
Data Privacy Protection AI applications often involve sensitive user data, making data privacy protection particularly critical in finance, healthcare, social networking, and other fields. AI Layer 1 should ensure data security throughout the entire process of inference, training, and storage by employing encryption-based data processing technologies, privacy computing protocols, and data access management, while also maintaining verifiability. This effectively prevents data leakage and misuse, alleviating users' concerns regarding data security.
Powerful ecological support and development capabilities As an AI-native Layer 1 infrastructure, the platform not only needs to possess technological leadership but also must provide comprehensive development tools, integrated SDKs, operational support, and incentive mechanisms for ecological participants such as developers, node operators, and AI service providers. By continuously optimizing platform usability and developer experience, the platform promotes the landing of diverse AI-native applications, achieving sustained prosperity of a decentralized AI ecosystem.
Based on the above background and expectations, this article will provide a detailed introduction to six representative AI Layer 1 projects, including Sentient, Sahara AI, Ritual, Gensyn, Bittensor, and 0G. It will systematically summarize the latest developments in the field, analyze the current status of the projects, and discuss future trends.
Sentient: Building a Loyal Open-Source Decentralized AI Model
Project Overview
Sentient is an open-source protocol platform that is building an AI Layer 1 blockchain ( initially as Layer 2, and will later migrate to Layer 1). By combining AI Pipeline and blockchain technology, it aims to construct a decentralized artificial intelligence economy. Its core goal is to address issues of model ownership, invocation tracking, and value distribution in the centralized LLM market through the "OML" framework (Open, Monetizable, Loyal), enabling AI models to achieve on-chain ownership structure, invocation transparency, and value sharing. Sentient's vision is to empower anyone to build, collaborate, own, and monetize AI products, thereby promoting a fair and open AI Agent network ecosystem.
The Sentient Foundation team brings together top academic experts, blockchain entrepreneurs, and engineers from around the world, dedicated to building a community-driven, open-source, and verifiable AGI platform. Core members include Princeton University professor Pramod Viswanath and Indian Institute of Science professor Himanshu Tyagi, who are responsible for AI safety and privacy protection, while Polygon co-founder Sandeep Nailwal leads the blockchain strategy and ecosystem layout. Team members come from well-known companies such as Meta, Coinbase, and Polygon, as well as top universities like Princeton University and the Indian Institutes of Technology, covering fields such as AI/ML, NLP, and computer vision, working together to promote the project's implementation.
As a second venture project of Polygon co-founder Sandeep Nailwal, Sentient was born with a halo, possessing rich resources, connections, and market recognition, providing strong backing for the project's development. In mid-2024, Sentient completed a $85 million seed round financing, led by Founders Fund, Pantera, and Framework Ventures, with other investment institutions including Delphi, Hashkey, and dozens of well-known VCs such as Spartan.
Design Architecture and Application Layer
Infrastructure Layer
Core Architecture
The core architecture of Sentient consists of two parts: AI Pipeline and on-chain system.
The AI pipeline is the foundation for developing and training "Loyal AI" artifacts, consisting of two core processes:
The blockchain system provides transparency and decentralized control for the protocol, ensuring the ownership, usage tracking, revenue distribution, and fair governance of AI artifacts. The specific architecture is divided into four layers:
OML Model Framework
The OML framework (Open, Monetizable, Loyal) is a core concept proposed by Sentient, aimed at providing clear ownership protection and economic incentives for open-source AI models. By combining on-chain technology with AI-native cryptography, it has the following characteristics:
AI-native Cryptography
AI-native encryption leverages the continuity, low-dimensional manifold structure, and differentiability of AI models to develop a "verifiable but non-removable" lightweight security mechanism. Its core technology is:
This method can achieve "behavior-based authorization call + ownership verification" without the cost of re-encryption.
Model Authorization and Secure Execution Framework
Sentient currently adopts Melange mixed security: combining fingerprint rights confirmation, TEE execution, and on-chain contract profit sharing. The fingerprint method is implemented as OML 1.0, emphasizing the "Optimistic Security" concept, which assumes compliance by default and can detect and punish violations.
The fingerprint mechanism is a key implementation of OML, which generates a unique signature for the model during the training phase by embedding specific "question-answer" pairs. Through these signatures, the model owner can verify ownership and prevent unauthorized copying and commercialization. This mechanism not only protects the rights of model developers but also provides a traceable on-chain record of the model's usage behavior.
In addition, Sentient has launched the Enclave TEE computing framework, which utilizes trusted execution environments (such as AWS Nitro Enclaves) to ensure that the model only responds to authorized requests, preventing unauthorized access and use. Although TEE relies on hardware and has certain security risks, its high performance and real-time advantages make it a core technology for current model deployment.
In the future, Sentient plans to introduce zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) technology to further enhance privacy protection and verifiability.