Recently, some cryptocurrency investors have engaged in heated discussions about the development prospects of the $AFT project. Some believe that relying solely on retail investor power is insufficient to significantly pump the project's price. This viewpoint has sparked considerable reflection: in the blockchain investment field, are we overly reliant on retail investor sentiment?

In fact, the success of any crypto assets project requires the joint action of multiple factors. Although the participation of retail investors can indeed bring a certain level of liquidity and attention to the project, it is difficult to sustain long-term stable growth based solely on this. The project's own technological innovation, application scenarios, team strength, and other factors are the key determinants of its future development.

It is worth noting that during the discussion, someone mentioned the issue of trust in Chinese project teams. However, we should not link the credibility of a project to the nationality of the development team. In the globalized blockchain industry, what matters is the actual value and potential of the project, rather than the cultural background of the developers.

Another noteworthy perspective is regarding the level of unity among investor groups. Some believe that certain groups may reach a consensus more easily when it comes to interests. However, this viewpoint may oversimplify the complex dynamics of groups. In the crypto assets market, investment decisions are often based on individual judgment and market analysis rather than simple group behavior.

Overall, for $AFT or any other crypto assets project, we should maintain a rational and objective attitude. While there may be fluctuations in the short term, long-term success depends more on the actual value of the project and market recognition. As retail investors, it is important to conduct in-depth research, understand the core value of the project, rather than blindly following market sentiment or overly relying on the influence of a particular group.